Meikleville Hill vs Taranganba, QLD Suburb Comparison

Meikleville Hill for beach lifestyle; Taranganba for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Meikleville HillTaranganba

Overall score

Meikleville Hill

42.0/100

Taranganba

41.6/100

Crime rate

Meikleville Hill

63.9 / 1k

Taranganba

63.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Meikleville Hill

2

Taranganba

19

Population

Meikleville Hill

450

Taranganba

2,275

Metric leadMeikleville Hill 5Taranganba 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMeikleville HillTaranganba
Overall score42.0/10041.6/100
Housing (desirability)57.4/10054.1/100
Crime rate63.9 / 1k63.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools32
Weather (desirability)18.0/10018.0/100
Parks & reserves—3
Walkability2.0/10042.0/100
Nearby amenities219
Green cover33.5%2.7%
Population4502,275
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/104/10

Comparison summary

Meikleville Hill is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, while Taranganba is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Meikleville Hill leans into coastal living, while Taranganba feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Meikleville Hill is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Taranganba answers with housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Meikleville Hill sits in a gently premium band, compared with a expensive feel in Taranganba.

Families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools may find Meikleville Hill the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Taranganba.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons