Merrigum vs Undera, VIC Suburb Comparison

Merrigum for families and investment; Undera for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MerrigumUndera

Overall score

Merrigum

33.5/100

Undera

28.3/100

Crime rate

Merrigum

46.0 / 1k

Undera

44.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Merrigum

2

Undera

1

Population

Merrigum

679

Undera

450

Metric leadMerrigum 5Undera 43 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMerrigumUndera
Overall score33.5/10028.3/100
Housing (desirability)58.2/10031.9/100
Crime rate46.0 / 1k44.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)18.6/10018.6/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops3—
Walkability4.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities21
Planning activity2016
Green cover0.1%0.9%
Population679450
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Merrigum is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Undera is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Merrigum is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability; Undera answers with a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Merrigum the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Undera.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons