Overall score
Middle Brook
34.6/100
Scone
61.3/100
Middle Brook vs Scone, NSW suburb comparison
Scone for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Middle BrookScone
Crime rate
Middle Brook
63.4 / 1k
Scone
64.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Middle Brook
0
Scone
126
Population
Middle Brook
260
Scone
5,824
Metric leadMiddle Brook 3Scone 6across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Middle Brook | Scone |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.6/100 | 61.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 74.0/100 | 77.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 63.4 / 1k | 64.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 59 | 237 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 126 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 53 |
| Population | 260 | 5,824 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Middle Brook reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Scone is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Middle Brook sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Scone is more regionally self-contained.
Middle Brook tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Scone stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Middle Brook generally means more mid-market housing value, while Scone leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Scone, while Middle Brook remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.