Overall score
Midway Point
48.8/100
Penna
33.1/100
Midway Point vs Penna, TAS suburb comparison
Midway Point for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Midway PointPenna
Crime rate
Midway Point
245.8 / 1k
Penna
1894.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Midway Point
35
Penna
0
Population
Midway Point
3,384
Penna
437
Metric leadMidway Point 6Penna 1across 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMidway Point
- Best for familiesMidway Point
- Best for investmentMidway Point
- Best for best valueMidway Point
- Best for best schoolsMidway Point
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Midway Point | Penna |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.8/100 | 33.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 30.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 245.8 / 1k | 1894.0 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Public transport stops | 4 | — |
| Walkability | 8.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 35 | 0 |
| Population | 3,384 | 437 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Midway Point reads as a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city; Penna is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Penna sits among greener hillside streets, while Midway Point keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Midway Point tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Penna stands out for stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Midway Point sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Penna.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Midway Point, while Penna remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.