Mitchell Park vs South Plympton, SA suburb comparison

Mitchell Park for investment and value; South Plympton for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mitchell ParkSouth Plympton

Overall score

Mitchell Park

54.6/100

South Plympton

56.4/100

Crime rate

Mitchell Park

70.1 / 1k

South Plympton

38.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mitchell Park

113

South Plympton

63

Population

Mitchell Park

5,754

South Plympton

4,721

Metric leadMitchell Park 5South Plympton 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMitchell ParkSouth Plympton
Overall score54.6/10056.4/100
Housing (desirability)52.7/10038.0/100
Crime rate70.1 / 1k38.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools33
Public transport stops2922
Walkability51.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities11363
Planning activity5557
Population5,7544,721
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/106/10

Comparison summary

Mitchell Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while South Plympton is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Mitchell Park is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; South Plympton answers with a quieter safety profile and walkability. Mitchell Park generally means more approachable housing costs, while South Plympton leans toward more sought-after housing.

Mitchell Park suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas South Plympton is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Related comparisons