Overall score
Mitchell Park
54.6/100
Sturt
52.6/100
Mitchell Park vs Sturt, SA suburb comparison
Sturt for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mitchell ParkSturt
Crime rate
Mitchell Park
70.1 / 1k
Sturt
50.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mitchell Park
113
Sturt
62
Population
Mitchell Park
5,754
Sturt
2,787
Metric leadMitchell Park 5Sturt 4across 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mitchell Park | Sturt |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.6/100 | 52.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 52.7/100 | 50.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 70.1 / 1k | 50.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 29 | 18 |
| Walkability | 51.0/100 | 58.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 113 | 62 |
| Planning activity | 55 | 30 |
| Population | 5,754 | 2,787 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Mitchell Park reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Sturt is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Mitchell Park sits closer to the city centre, whereas Sturt is in a middle-ring position.
Mitchell Park tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Sturt stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability.
Choose Mitchell Park if you are weighing investors; lean toward Sturt for retirees and families.