Mitchell Park vs Sturt, SA Suburb Comparison

Mitchell Park for investment and value; Sturt for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mitchell ParkSturt

Overall score

Mitchell Park

37.9/100

Sturt

41.1/100

Crime rate

Mitchell Park

73.9 / 1k

Sturt

48.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mitchell Park

115

Sturt

68

Population

Mitchell Park

5,754

Sturt

2,787

Metric leadMitchell Park 5Sturt 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMitchell ParkSturt
Overall score37.9/10041.1/100
Housing (desirability)84.3/10067.8/100
Crime rate73.9 / 1k48.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools3
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Public transport stops2918
Walkability51.0/10058.0/100
Nearby amenities11568
Planning activity6136
Green cover6.1%1.4%
Population5,7542,787
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/103/10

Comparison summary

Mitchell Park reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Sturt is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Mitchell Park sits closer to the city centre, whereas Sturt is in a middle-ring position.

Mitchell Park tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Sturt stands out for a quieter safety profile, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Sturt, while Mitchell Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons