Overall score
Montrose
71.6/100
Mount Dandenong
44.8/100
Montrose for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Montrose
71.6/100
Mount Dandenong
44.8/100
Crime rate
Montrose
36.9 / 1k
Mount Dandenong
48.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Montrose
187
Mount Dandenong
151
Population
Montrose
6,900
Mount Dandenong
1,271
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Montrose | Mount Dandenong |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 71.6/100 | 44.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.1/100 | 27.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 36.9 / 1k | 48.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 38 | 35 |
| Walkability | 94.0/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 187 | 151 |
| Planning activity | 64 | 22 |
| Population | 6,900 | 1,271 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Montrose is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, and Mount Dandenong is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks.
Montrose tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Mount Dandenong stands out for a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Montrose sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Mount Dandenong.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Montrose, while Mount Dandenong remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.