Overall score
Moorak
45.6/100
Port Macdonnell
26.5/100
Moorak for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Moorak
45.6/100
Port Macdonnell
26.5/100
Crime rate
Moorak
9.7 / 1k
Port Macdonnell
28.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Moorak
0
Port Macdonnell
6
Population
Moorak
1,412
Port Macdonnell
859
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Moorak | Port Macdonnell |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 45.6/100 | 26.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 91.7/100 | 2.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.7 / 1k | 28.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | — |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 9 | 26 |
| Population | 1,412 | 859 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 3/10 |
Moorak reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Port Macdonnell is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
On the data, Moorak is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Port Macdonnell answers with nearby cafés and amenities. Moorak generally means more mid-market housing value, while Port Macdonnell leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Moorak, while Port Macdonnell remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.