Moorak vs Port Macdonnell, SA Suburb Comparison

Moorak for retirees and value; Port Macdonnell for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MoorakPort Macdonnell

Overall score

Moorak

39.3/100

Port Macdonnell

38.0/100

Crime rate

Moorak

9.7 / 1k

Port Macdonnell

28.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Moorak

2

Port Macdonnell

10

Population

Moorak

1,412

Port Macdonnell

859

Metric leadMoorak 7Port Macdonnell 12 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMoorakPort Macdonnell
Overall score39.3/10038.0/100
Housing (desirability)46.7/10044.2/100
Crime rate9.7 / 1k28.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—1
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities210
Planning activity1129
Green cover0.4%0.2%
Population1,412859
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/103/10

Comparison summary

Moorak reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Port Macdonnell is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.

On the data, Moorak is stronger for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and tree cover and green space; Port Macdonnell answers with nearby cafés and amenities. Moorak generally means more approachable mid-market housing, while Port Macdonnell leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Moorak, while Port Macdonnell remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons