Overall score
Mount Schank
27.7/100
Port Macdonnell
24.4/100
Mount Schank vs Port Macdonnell, SA suburb comparison
Mount Schank for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mount SchankPort Macdonnell
Crime rate
Mount Schank
8.0 / 1k
Port Macdonnell
27.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Schank
1
Port Macdonnell
6
Population
Mount Schank
264
Port Macdonnell
859
Metric leadMount Schank 4Port Macdonnell 22 tiedacross 8 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMount Schank
- Best for familiesMount Schank
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Schank | Port Macdonnell |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 27.7/100 | 24.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 2.6/100 | 2.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.0 / 1k | 27.1 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 26 |
| Population | 264 | 859 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Mount Schank is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Port Macdonnell is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Mount Schank sits among greener hillside streets, while Port Macdonnell keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Schank is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Port Macdonnell answers with nearby cafés and amenities and overall desirability. Mount Schank generally means more mid-market housing value, while Port Macdonnell leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees and families may find Mount Schank the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Port Macdonnell.