Overall score
Mount Schank
30.9/100
Port Macdonnell
38.0/100
Mount Schank vs Port Macdonnell, SA Suburb Comparison
Port Macdonnell for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mount SchankPort Macdonnell
Crime rate
Mount Schank
27.9 / 1k
Port Macdonnell
28.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Schank
2
Port Macdonnell
10
Population
Mount Schank
264
Port Macdonnell
859
Metric leadMount Schank 4Port Macdonnell 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesPort Macdonnell
- Best for investmentPort Macdonnell
- Best for best valuePort Macdonnell
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Schank | Port Macdonnell |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 30.9/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 4.7/100 | 44.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 27.9 / 1k | 28.3 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 10 |
| Planning activity | 6 | 29 |
| Green cover | 0.3% | 0.2% |
| Population | 264 | 859 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Mount Schank is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Port Macdonnell is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Mount Schank sits among greener hillside streets, while Port Macdonnell keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Mount Schank is stronger for a quieter safety profile, tree cover and green space, and a calmer planning outlook; Port Macdonnell answers with nearby cafés and amenities, overall desirability, and a larger local community. Mount Schank generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Port Macdonnell leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Retirees may find Mount Schank the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Port Macdonnell.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.