Morphett Vale vs Onkaparinga Hills, SA Suburb Comparison

Morphett Vale for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Morphett ValeOnkaparinga Hills

Overall score

Morphett Vale

48.2/100

Onkaparinga Hills

36.4/100

Crime rate

Morphett Vale

55.9 / 1k

Onkaparinga Hills

3.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Morphett Vale

325

Onkaparinga Hills

9

Population

Morphett Vale

24,002

Onkaparinga Hills

2,610

Metric leadMorphett Vale 7Onkaparinga Hills 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMorphett ValeOnkaparinga Hills
Overall score48.2/10036.4/100
Housing (desirability)77.5/10050.5/100
Crime rate55.9 / 1k3.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools14—
Weather (desirability)56.4/10056.4/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops1324
Walkability92.0/1006.0/100
Nearby amenities3259
Planning activity34850
Green cover14.7%1.0%
Population24,0022,610
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/107/10

Comparison summary

Morphett Vale is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Onkaparinga Hills is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks. Onkaparinga Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Morphett Vale keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Morphett Vale pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Onkaparinga Hills is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Morphett Vale suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Onkaparinga Hills is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons