Mortlake vs Rhodes, NSW suburb comparison

Mortlake for retirees and families; Rhodes for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MortlakeRhodes

Overall score

Mortlake

36.2/100

Rhodes

57.6/100

Crime rate

Mortlake

29.4 / 1k

Rhodes

40.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mortlake

17

Rhodes

343

Population

Mortlake

1,954

Rhodes

11,453

Metric leadMortlake 2Rhodes 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMortlakeRhodes
Overall score36.2/10057.6/100
Housing (desirability)7.7/1008.7/100
Crime rate29.4 / 1k40.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools68
Parks & reserves17
Public transport stops660
Walkability9.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities17343
Planning activity57
Population1,95411,453
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mortlake is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, and Rhodes is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Mortlake tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Rhodes stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.

Mortlake suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Rhodes is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons