Rhodes vs Sydney Olympic Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Rhodes for investment; Sydney Olympic Park for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RhodesSydney Olympic Park

Overall score

Rhodes

57.2/100

Sydney Olympic Park

58.0/100

Crime rate

Rhodes

40.5 / 1k

Sydney Olympic Park

60.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rhodes

356

Sydney Olympic Park

692

Population

Rhodes

11,453

Sydney Olympic Park

4,848

Metric leadRhodes 8Sydney Olympic Park 32 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRhodesSydney Olympic Park
Overall score57.2/10058.0/100
Housing (desirability)52.1/10047.2/100
Crime rate40.5 / 1k60.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools84
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves76
Public transport stops6042
Walkability100.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities356692
Planning activity1314
Green cover10.5%36.1%
Population11,4534,848
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Rhodes is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Sydney Olympic Park is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Rhodes pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, whereas Sydney Olympic Park is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities.

Rhodes suits investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Sydney Olympic Park is the stronger match for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons