Overall score
Mount Barker
60.9/100
Devonport
71.3/100
Mount Barker for retirees and schools; Devonport for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Barker
60.9/100
Devonport
71.3/100
Crime rate
Mount Barker
29.4 / 1k
Devonport
165.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Barker
250
Devonport
321
Population
Mount Barker
18,330
Devonport
14,481
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Barker | Devonport |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.9/100 | 71.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.6/100 | 73.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.4 / 1k | 165.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 64 | 73 |
| Walkability | 80.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 250 | 321 |
| Planning activity | 440 | — |
| Population | 18,330 | 14,481 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 1/10 |
Mount Barker (SA) is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks, while Devonport (TAS) is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Mount Barker sits among greener hillside streets, while Devonport keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Barker tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a larger local community, while Devonport stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options. Mount Barker generally means more sought-after housing, while Devonport leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Mount Barker if you are weighing retirees and households prioritising schools; lean toward Devonport for investors and value-focused buyers.