Mount Druitt vs Rooty Hill, NSW Suburb Comparison

Mount Druitt for retirees; Rooty Hill for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount DruittRooty Hill

Overall score

Mount Druitt

45.4/100

Rooty Hill

52.5/100

Crime rate

Mount Druitt

194.3 / 1k

Rooty Hill

76.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Druitt

425

Rooty Hill

260

Population

Mount Druitt

16,986

Rooty Hill

16,176

Metric leadMount Druitt 6Rooty Hill 61 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount DruittRooty Hill
Overall score45.4/10052.5/100
Housing (desirability)18.8/10040.1/100
Crime rate194.3 / 1k76.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools129
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1812
Public transport stops182145
Walkability100.0/10092.0/100
Nearby amenities425260
Planning activity3623
Green cover13.2%15.1%
Population16,98616,176
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Mount Druitt is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks, and Rooty Hill is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Mount Druitt sits among greener hillside streets, while Rooty Hill keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Mount Druitt pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Rooty Hill is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook. Mount Druitt generally means more approachable housing costs, while Rooty Hill leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Mount Druitt if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Rooty Hill for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons