Overall score
Orange
42.5/100
Mount Gambier
51.5/100
Orange for value and schools; Mount Gambier for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Orange
42.5/100
Mount Gambier
51.5/100
Crime rate
Orange
94.4 / 1k
Mount Gambier
58.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Orange
25
Mount Gambier
565
Population
Orange
41,232
Mount Gambier
25,591
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Orange | Mount Gambier |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 42.5/100 | 51.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.0/100 | 70.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.4 / 1k | 58.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 20 |
| Weather (desirability) | 52.5/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 54 | — |
| Public transport stops | 1,535 | 121 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 25 | 565 |
| Planning activity | 250 | 226 |
| Green cover | 2.3% | 8.0% |
| Population | 41,232 | 25,591 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Orange is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, whereas Mount Gambier is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Orange keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Orange tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and a larger local community, while Mount Gambier stands out for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability. Orange generally means more sought-after housing, while Mount Gambier leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Orange, while Mount Gambier remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.