Overall score
Mount Gambier
67.1/100
Tarpeena
26.3/100
Mount Gambier for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Gambier
67.1/100
Tarpeena
26.3/100
Crime rate
Mount Gambier
67.0 / 1k
Tarpeena
42.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Gambier
554
Tarpeena
0
Population
Mount Gambier
25,591
Tarpeena
392
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Gambier | Tarpeena |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 67.1/100 | 26.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.7/100 | 44.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 67.0 / 1k | 42.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 20 | — |
| Public transport stops | 121 | — |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 554 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 197 | 2 |
| Population | 25,591 | 392 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Mount Gambier is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks, and Tarpeena is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Tarpeena keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Gambier pulls ahead on housing affordability and walkability, whereas Tarpeena is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mount Gambier, while Tarpeena remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.