Mount Gambier vs Yahl, SA Suburb Comparison

Mount Gambier for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount GambierYahl

Overall score

Mount Gambier

51.5/100

Yahl

36.9/100

Crime rate

Mount Gambier

58.7 / 1k

Yahl

18.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Gambier

565

Yahl

4

Population

Mount Gambier

25,591

Yahl

817

Metric leadMount Gambier 7Yahl 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount GambierYahl
Overall score51.5/10036.9/100
Housing (desirability)70.8/10038.9/100
Crime rate58.7 / 1k18.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools201
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops121—
Walkability100.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities5654
Planning activity2389
Green cover8.0%0.8%
Population25,591817
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Mount Gambier is a leafier hillside larger suburb with elevated outlooks, while Yahl is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Mount Gambier sits among greener hillside streets, while Yahl keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Mount Gambier tends to lead on schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Yahl stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Mount Gambier sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Yahl.

Mount Gambier suits families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Yahl is the stronger match for retirees and investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons