Mount Hawthorn vs North Perth, WA Suburb Comparison

Mount Hawthorn for value; North Perth for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount HawthornNorth Perth

Overall score

Mount Hawthorn

52.8/100

North Perth

55.3/100

Crime rate

Mount Hawthorn

96.4 / 1k

North Perth

96.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Hawthorn

271

North Perth

348

Population

Mount Hawthorn

8,183

North Perth

9,623

Metric leadMount Hawthorn 2North Perth 64 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount HawthornNorth Perth
Overall score52.8/10055.3/100
Housing (desirability)48.8/10051.0/100
Crime rate96.4 / 1k96.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1310
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves54
Public transport stops4549
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities271348
Planning activity—1
Green cover2.7%6.8%
Population8,1839,623
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Mount Hawthorn reads as a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks; North Perth is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Mount Hawthorn sits among greener hillside streets, while North Perth keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Mount Hawthorn tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves, while North Perth stands out for public transport access, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Hawthorn, while North Perth remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons