Leederville vs Mount Hawthorn, WA Suburb Comparison

Leederville for retirees and families; Mount Hawthorn for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LeedervilleMount Hawthorn

Overall score

Leederville

61.2/100

Mount Hawthorn

52.8/100

Crime rate

Leederville

96.4 / 1k

Mount Hawthorn

96.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Leederville

253

Mount Hawthorn

271

Population

Leederville

3,686

Mount Hawthorn

8,183

Metric leadLeederville 3Mount Hawthorn 54 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLeedervilleMount Hawthorn
Overall score61.2/10052.8/100
Housing (desirability)51.8/10048.8/100
Crime rate96.4 / 1k96.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools1213
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves35
Public transport stops2145
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities253271
Green cover16.6%2.7%
Population3,6868,183
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Leederville reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Mount Hawthorn is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Mount Hawthorn sits among greener hillside streets, while Leederville keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Leederville tends to lead on a busy dining and café scene, plus a hub for schools and preschools, while Mount Hawthorn stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Mount Hawthorn, while Leederville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons