Leederville vs Subiaco, WA Suburb Comparison

Leederville for retirees and investment; Subiaco for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LeedervilleSubiaco

Overall score

Leederville

61.2/100

Subiaco

60.0/100

Crime rate

Leederville

96.4 / 1k

Subiaco

96.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Leederville

253

Subiaco

1,454

Population

Leederville

3,686

Subiaco

9,940

Metric leadLeederville 4Subiaco 44 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLeedervilleSubiaco
Overall score61.2/10060.0/100
Housing (desirability)51.8/10051.6/100
Crime rate96.4 / 1k96.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools127
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves314
Public transport stops2161
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities2531,454
Green cover16.6%5.0%
Population3,6869,940
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Leederville is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Subiaco is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Leederville is stronger for housing affordability, plus schools and education options; Subiaco answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Subiaco, while Leederville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons