Mount Hicks vs Wynyard, TAS Suburb Comparison

Mount Hicks for value; Wynyard for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount HicksWynyard

Overall score

Mount Hicks

41.5/100

Wynyard

43.8/100

Crime rate

Mount Hicks

50.0 / 1k

Wynyard

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Hicks

2

Wynyard

18

Population

Mount Hicks

356

Wynyard

6,296

Metric leadMount Hicks 2Wynyard 52 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount HicksWynyard
Overall score41.5/10043.8/100
Housing (desirability)69.0/10081.0/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools—3
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—3
Public transport stops—33
Walkability0.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities218
Green cover10.0%5.6%
Population3566,296
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Mount Hicks reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Wynyard is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Mount Hicks sits among greener hillside streets, while Wynyard keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Mount Hicks tends to lead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Wynyard stands out for walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and overall desirability. Mount Hicks generally means more mid-market housing value, while Wynyard leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Mount Hicks if you are weighing retirees, families, and investors; lean toward Wynyard for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons