Mount Rumney vs Rokeby, TAS suburb comparison

Mount Rumney for retirees; Rokeby for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount RumneyRokeby

Overall score

Mount Rumney

39.4/100

Rokeby

61.3/100

Crime rate

Mount Rumney

11225.4 / 1k

Rokeby

789.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Rumney

3

Rokeby

112

Population

Mount Rumney

303

Rokeby

4,211

Metric leadMount Rumney 1Rokeby 61 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount RumneyRokeby
Overall score39.4/10061.3/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate11225.4 / 1k789.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools5
Parks & reserves56
Public transport stops44
Walkability0.0/10084.0/100
Nearby amenities3112
Population3034,211
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/101/10

Comparison summary

Mount Rumney reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Rokeby is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.

Mount Rumney pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Rokeby is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. On housing, Mount Rumney sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Rokeby.

On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Rokeby, while Mount Rumney remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons