Overall score
Clarendon Vale
43.1/100
Mount Rumney
39.4/100
Clarendon Vale for families and schools; Mount Rumney for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clarendon Vale
43.1/100
Mount Rumney
39.4/100
Crime rate
Clarendon Vale
2025.2 / 1k
Mount Rumney
11225.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clarendon Vale
34
Mount Rumney
3
Population
Clarendon Vale
1,635
Mount Rumney
303
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clarendon Vale | Mount Rumney |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.1/100 | 39.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 2025.2 / 1k | 11225.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 18 | — |
| Walkability | 27.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 34 | 3 |
| Population | 1,635 | 303 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Clarendon Vale is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Mount Rumney is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Mount Rumney sits among greener hillside streets, while Clarendon Vale keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Clarendon Vale tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, while Mount Rumney stands out for parks and reserves and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Clarendon Vale generally means more approachable housing costs, while Mount Rumney leans toward more sought-after housing.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Clarendon Vale the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Mount Rumney.