Overall score
Clarendon Vale
43.1/100
Lauderdale
61.1/100
Clarendon Vale for schools; Lauderdale for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Clarendon Vale
43.1/100
Lauderdale
61.1/100
Crime rate
Clarendon Vale
2025.2 / 1k
Lauderdale
1334.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clarendon Vale
34
Lauderdale
169
Population
Clarendon Vale
1,635
Lauderdale
2,592
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clarendon Vale | Lauderdale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.1/100 | 61.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 2025.2 / 1k | 1334.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 18 | 36 |
| Walkability | 27.0/100 | 88.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 34 | 169 |
| Population | 1,635 | 2,592 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 8/10 |
Put side by side, Clarendon Vale is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Lauderdale is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Clarendon Vale sits closer to the city centre, whereas Lauderdale is in a middle-ring position.
Clarendon Vale pulls ahead on schools and education options, whereas Lauderdale is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. On housing, Clarendon Vale sits in a affordable band, compared with a well priced feel in Lauderdale.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Lauderdale, while Clarendon Vale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.