Murchison vs Tatura, VIC suburb comparison

Tatura for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MurchisonTatura

Overall score

Murchison

27.9/100

Tatura

64.0/100

Crime rate

Murchison

83.2 / 1k

Tatura

58.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Murchison

0

Tatura

176

Population

Murchison

884

Tatura

4,955

Metric leadMurchison 1Tatura 91 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMurchisonTatura
Overall score27.9/10064.0/100
Housing (desirability)73.8/10074.2/100
Crime rate83.2 / 1k58.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Parks & reserves37
Public transport stops22
Walkability3.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities0176
Planning activity1869
Population8844,955
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Murchison is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Tatura is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Murchison tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, while Tatura stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Tatura, while Murchison remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons