Murray Bridge vs Riverglades, SA Suburb Comparison

Murray Bridge for schools; Riverglades for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Murray BridgeRiverglades

Overall score

Murray Bridge

35.4/100

Riverglades

38.1/100

Crime rate

Murray Bridge

100.5 / 1k

Riverglades

8.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Murray Bridge

196

Riverglades

7

Population

Murray Bridge

15,043

Riverglades

856

Metric leadMurray Bridge 5Riverglades 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMurray BridgeRiverglades
Overall score35.4/10038.1/100
Housing (desirability)60.0/10066.5/100
Crime rate100.5 / 1k8.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools13—
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops391
Walkability82.0/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities1967
Planning activity2057
Green cover0.9%0.1%
Population15,043856
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Murray Bridge is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Riverglades is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Murray Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Riverglades keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Murray Bridge tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Riverglades stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook. Murray Bridge generally means more approachable housing costs, while Riverglades leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Murray Bridge the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Riverglades.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons