Murray Bridge vs Riverglades, SA suburb comparison

Murray Bridge for schools; Riverglades for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Murray BridgeRiverglades

Overall score

Murray Bridge

59.9/100

Riverglades

37.9/100

Crime rate

Murray Bridge

87.8 / 1k

Riverglades

6.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Murray Bridge

192

Riverglades

2

Population

Murray Bridge

15,043

Riverglades

856

Metric leadMurray Bridge 5Riverglades 4across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMurray BridgeRiverglades
Overall score59.9/10037.9/100
Housing (desirability)52.2/10077.2/100
Crime rate87.8 / 1k6.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Public transport stops391
Walkability82.0/1001.5/100
Nearby amenities1922
Planning activity1653
Population15,043856
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Murray Bridge is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Riverglades is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Murray Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Riverglades keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Murray Bridge tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Riverglades stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Murray Bridge generally means more approachable housing costs, while Riverglades leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Investors and households prioritising schools may find Murray Bridge the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Riverglades.

Related comparisons