Murray Bridge vs Renmark, SA Suburb Comparison

Murray Bridge for investment; Renmark for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Murray BridgeRenmark

Overall score

Murray Bridge

35.4/100

Renmark

42.6/100

Crime rate

Murray Bridge

100.5 / 1k

Renmark

71.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Murray Bridge

196

Renmark

309

Population

Murray Bridge

15,043

Renmark

4,705

Metric leadMurray Bridge 4Renmark 71 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMurray BridgeRenmark
Overall score35.4/10042.6/100
Housing (desirability)60.0/10069.7/100
Crime rate100.5 / 1k71.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools136
Weather (desirability)37.3/1005.7/100
Public transport stops3911
Walkability82.0/10086.5/100
Nearby amenities196309
Planning activity20563
Green cover0.9%1.8%
Population15,0434,705
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Murray Bridge is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Renmark is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Murray Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Renmark keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Murray Bridge pulls ahead on schools and education options, public transport access, and overall desirability, whereas Renmark is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.

On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Murray Bridge, while Renmark remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons