Murray Bridge vs Rockleigh, SA Suburb Comparison

Murray Bridge for families and value; Rockleigh for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Murray BridgeRockleigh

Overall score

Murray Bridge

35.4/100

Rockleigh

35.7/100

Crime rate

Murray Bridge

100.5 / 1k

Rockleigh

13.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Murray Bridge

196

Rockleigh

0

Population

Murray Bridge

15,043

Rockleigh

287

Metric leadMurray Bridge 5Rockleigh 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMurray BridgeRockleigh
Overall score35.4/10035.7/100
Housing (desirability)60.0/10043.6/100
Crime rate100.5 / 1k13.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools13—
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops39—
Walkability82.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities1960
Planning activity20510
Green cover0.9%0.0%
Population15,043287
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Murray Bridge is a hills established suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Rockleigh is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Murray Bridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Rockleigh keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Murray Bridge is stronger for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Rockleigh answers with a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Murray Bridge generally means more approachable housing costs, while Rockleigh leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Murray Bridge the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Rockleigh.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons