Overall score
Nakara
48.0/100
Nightcliff
52.8/100
Nakara vs Nightcliff, NT suburb comparison
Nakara for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
NakaraNightcliff
Crime rate
Nakara
2293.5 / 1k
Nightcliff
1051.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Nakara
44
Nightcliff
149
Population
Nakara
1,906
Nightcliff
3,884
Metric leadNakara 2Nightcliff 8across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Nakara | Nightcliff |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.0/100 | 52.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 17.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 2293.5 / 1k | 1051.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 8 | 11 |
| Walkability | 12.0/100 | 53.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 44 | 149 |
| Population | 1,906 | 3,884 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Nakara is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, and Nightcliff is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Nakara is stronger for housing affordability; Nightcliff answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. On housing, Nakara sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Nightcliff.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Nakara, while Nightcliff remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.