Overall score
Noarlunga Downs
35.5/100
Port Noarlunga South
35.2/100
Noarlunga Downs for investment; Port Noarlunga South for beach lifestyle and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Noarlunga Downs
35.5/100
Port Noarlunga South
35.2/100
Crime rate
Noarlunga Downs
43.6 / 1k
Port Noarlunga South
31.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Noarlunga Downs
89
Port Noarlunga South
99
Population
Noarlunga Downs
4,031
Port Noarlunga South
3,058
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Noarlunga Downs | Port Noarlunga South |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.5/100 | 35.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 77.9/100 | 54.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.6 / 1k | 31.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 2 |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 34 | 20 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 89 | 99 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 136 |
| Green cover | 3.9% | 3.0% |
| Population | 4,031 | 3,058 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Noarlunga Downs is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Port Noarlunga South is a coastal mid-sized suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Port Noarlunga South leans into coastal living, while Noarlunga Downs feels more inland and suburban in character.
Noarlunga Downs tends to lead on housing affordability, public transport access, and tree cover and green space, while Port Noarlunga South stands out for a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities.
Retirees, families, and value-focused buyers may find Noarlunga Downs the better fit, while people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Port Noarlunga South.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.