Nome vs Stuart, QLD suburb comparison

Nome for retirees and families; Stuart for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

NomeStuart

Overall score

Nome

26.1/100

Stuart

26.3/100

Crime rate

Nome

79.4 / 1k

Stuart

71.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Nome

1

Stuart

0

Population

Nome

990

Stuart

1,576

Metric leadNome 2Stuart 41 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNomeStuart
Overall score26.1/10026.3/100
Housing (desirability)11.9/10041.0/100
Crime rate79.4 / 1k71.9 / 1k
Parks & reserves1
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities10
Population9901,576
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Nome is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Stuart is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Nome tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Stuart stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Nome generally means more mid-market housing value, while Stuart leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Retirees may find Nome the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Stuart.

Related comparisons