North Plympton vs Richmond, SA suburb comparison

North Plympton for retirees and value; Richmond for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

North PlymptonRichmond

Overall score

North Plympton

49.9/100

Richmond

43.0/100

Crime rate

North Plympton

21.4 / 1k

Richmond

42.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

North Plympton

85

Richmond

111

Population

North Plympton

3,610

Richmond

3,474

Metric leadNorth Plympton 7Richmond 2across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNorth PlymptonRichmond
Overall score49.9/10043.0/100
Housing (desirability)32.9/10026.2/100
Crime rate21.4 / 1k42.2 / 1k
Public transport stops205
Walkability36.0/10015.5/100
Nearby amenities85111
Planning activity4037
Population3,6103,474
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/105/10

Comparison summary

North Plympton reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Richmond is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, North Plympton is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Richmond answers with nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook.

Retirees and value-focused buyers may find North Plympton the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Richmond.

Related comparisons