Richmond vs Torrensville, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Richmond | Torrensville |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.9/100 | 56.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 26.2/100 | 25.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 45.5 / 1k | 88.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 20 |
| Walkability | 15.5/100 | 84.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 111 | 217 |
| Planning activity | 27 | 39 |
| Population | 3,474 | 4,110 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for familiesRichmond
- Best for best valueTorrensville
- Best for best schoolsRichmond
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Richmond is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Torrensville is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Richmond is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Torrensville answers with public transport access and walkability.
Richmond suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Torrensville is the stronger match for value-focused buyers.