O'Connor vs Turner, ACT suburb comparison

O'Connor for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

O'ConnorTurner

Overall score

O'Connor

64.2/100

Turner

52.0/100

Crime rate

O'Connor

16.5 / 1k

Turner

31.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

O'Connor

247

Turner

124

Population

O'Connor

5,917

Turner

4,470

Metric leadO'Connor 8Turner 11 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryO'ConnorTurner
Overall score64.2/10052.0/100
Housing (desirability)39.2/10012.0/100
Crime rate16.5 / 1k31.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools78
Parks & reserves21
Walkability80.0/10034.5/100
Nearby amenities247124
Planning activity67
Population5,9174,470
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

O'Connor is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Turner is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, O'Connor is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Turner answers with schools and education options.

Choose O'Connor if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Turner for retirees.

Related comparisons