City vs O'Connor, ACT suburb comparison

O'Connor for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CityO'Connor

Overall score

City

62.3/100

O'Connor

64.2/100

Crime rate

City

193.3 / 1k

O'Connor

16.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

City

844

O'Connor

247

Population

City

4,835

O'Connor

5,917

Metric leadCity 3O'Connor 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCityO'Connor
Overall score62.3/10064.2/100
Housing (desirability)2.4/10039.2/100
Crime rate193.3 / 1k16.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools47
Parks & reserves52
Walkability100.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities844247
Planning activity66
Population4,8355,917
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

City reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; O'Connor is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, City is stronger for parks and reserves and walkability; O'Connor answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer O'Connor, while City remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons