Dickson vs O'Connor, ACT suburb comparison

O'Connor for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

DicksonO'Connor

Overall score

Dickson

66.1/100

O'Connor

64.2/100

Crime rate

Dickson

92.9 / 1k

O'Connor

16.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dickson

334

O'Connor

247

Population

Dickson

3,292

O'Connor

5,917

Metric leadDickson 4O'Connor 51 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDicksonO'Connor
Overall score66.1/10064.2/100
Housing (desirability)25.5/10039.2/100
Crime rate92.9 / 1k16.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools137
Parks & reserves12
Walkability100.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities334247
Planning activity106
Population3,2925,917
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Dickson reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; O'Connor is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Dickson tends to lead on schools and education options and walkability, while O'Connor stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer O'Connor, while Dickson remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons