Overall score
Orange
54.9/100
Parkes
44.9/100
Orange for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Orange
54.9/100
Parkes
44.9/100
Crime rate
Orange
94.4 / 1k
Parkes
127.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Orange
15
Parkes
0
Population
Orange
41,232
Parkes
11,324
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Orange | Parkes |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.9/100 | 44.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.7/100 | 68.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.4 / 1k | 127.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 54 | 31 |
| Public transport stops | 1,535 | 970 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 15 | 0 |
| Planning activity | 220 | 61 |
| Population | 41,232 | 11,324 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Orange is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Parkes is a more rural established suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe. Orange sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Parkes is further into the wider countryside.
Orange pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Parkes is the better pick for a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Orange sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Parkes.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Orange, while Parkes remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.