Overall score
Orange
54.9/100
Gosnells
53.8/100
Orange for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Orange
54.9/100
Gosnells
53.8/100
Crime rate
Orange
94.4 / 1k
Gosnells
553.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Orange
15
Gosnells
449
Population
Orange
41,232
Gosnells
21,149
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Orange | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.9/100 | 53.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.7/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.4 / 1k | 553.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 54 | 40 |
| Public transport stops | 1,535 | 143 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 15 | 449 |
| Planning activity | 220 | — |
| Population | 41,232 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Orange is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Orange sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Gosnells is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Orange is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Gosnells answers with walkability and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Orange sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.
Orange suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Gosnells is the stronger match for families.