Overall score
Gosnells
43.9/100
Martin
34.3/100
Gosnells for retirees and families; Martin for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Gosnells
43.9/100
Martin
34.3/100
Crime rate
Gosnells
60.1 / 1k
Martin
60.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gosnells
791
Martin
2
Population
Gosnells
21,149
Martin
1,854
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gosnells | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.9/100 | 34.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.0/100 | 34.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.1 / 1k | 60.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 40 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 143 | 7 |
| Walkability | 70.0/100 | 10.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 791 | 2 |
| Green cover | 10.3% | 53.8% |
| Population | 21,149 | 1,854 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 7/10 |
Gosnells reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Martin is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Gosnells sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Martin is further out with more breathing room.
On the data, Gosnells is stronger for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Martin answers with housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Choose Gosnells if you are weighing families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Martin for retirees and investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.