Maddington vs Martin, WA suburb comparison

Maddington for families and value; Martin for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MaddingtonMartin

Overall score

Maddington

50.6/100

Martin

30.2/100

Crime rate

Maddington

932.6 / 1k

Martin

6227.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maddington

163

Martin

0

Population

Maddington

12,419

Martin

1,854

Metric leadMaddington 8Martin 2across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMaddingtonMartin
Overall score50.6/10030.2/100
Housing (desirability)33.5/10041.2/100
Crime rate932.6 / 1k6227.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools71
Parks & reserves91
Public transport stops957
Walkability46.0/10010.5/100
Nearby amenities1630
Population12,4191,854
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/107/10

Comparison summary

Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Martin is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Maddington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Martin is further out with more breathing room.

Maddington pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Martin is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Maddington generally means more approachable housing costs, while Martin leans toward more sought-after housing.

Retirees and families may find Maddington the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Martin.

Related comparisons