Overall score
Maddington
39.8/100
Martin
34.3/100
Maddington vs Martin, WA Suburb Comparison
Maddington for families; Martin for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MaddingtonMartin
Crime rate
Maddington
60.1 / 1k
Martin
60.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Maddington
274
Martin
2
Population
Maddington
12,419
Martin
1,854
Metric leadMaddington 8Martin 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for familiesMaddington
- Best for best schoolsMartin
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Maddington | Martin |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.8/100 | 34.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.0/100 | 34.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 60.1 / 1k | 60.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 95 | 7 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 10.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 274 | 2 |
| Green cover | 8.2% | 53.8% |
| Population | 12,419 | 1,854 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Martin is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Maddington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Martin is further out with more breathing room.
Maddington pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Martin is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools may find Maddington the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Martin.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.