Overall score
Maddington
50.6/100
Thornlie
68.8/100
Thornlie for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Maddington
50.6/100
Thornlie
68.8/100
Crime rate
Maddington
932.6 / 1k
Thornlie
516.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Maddington
163
Thornlie
318
Population
Maddington
12,419
Thornlie
23,665
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Maddington | Thornlie |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.6/100 | 68.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 33.5/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 932.6 / 1k | 516.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 95 | 129 |
| Walkability | 46.0/100 | 86.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 163 | 318 |
| Population | 12,419 | 23,665 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 4/10 |
Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Thornlie is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Maddington tends to lead on excellent public transport and generous parks and open space, while Thornlie stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Maddington generally means more approachable housing costs, while Thornlie leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Thornlie, while Maddington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.