Maddington vs Thornlie, WA suburb comparison

Thornlie for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MaddingtonThornlie

Overall score

Maddington

50.6/100

Thornlie

68.8/100

Crime rate

Maddington

932.6 / 1k

Thornlie

516.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maddington

163

Thornlie

318

Population

Maddington

12,419

Thornlie

23,665

Metric leadMaddington 0Thornlie 91 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMaddingtonThornlie
Overall score50.6/10068.8/100
Housing (desirability)33.5/10076.0/100
Crime rate932.6 / 1k516.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools77
Parks & reserves915
Public transport stops95129
Walkability46.0/10086.0/100
Nearby amenities163318
Population12,41923,665
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/104/10

Comparison summary

Maddington is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Thornlie is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Maddington tends to lead on excellent public transport and generous parks and open space, while Thornlie stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Maddington generally means more approachable housing costs, while Thornlie leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Thornlie, while Maddington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons