Otago vs Richmond, TAS suburb comparison

Otago for retirees and investment; Richmond for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

OtagoRichmond

Overall score

Otago

36.6/100

Richmond

33.7/100

Crime rate

Otago

5684.9 / 1k

Richmond

2024.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Otago

18

Richmond

5

Population

Otago

596

Richmond

1,583

Metric leadOtago 6Richmond 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryOtagoRichmond
Overall score36.6/10033.7/100
Housing (desirability)48.8/10026.3/100
Crime rate5684.9 / 1k2024.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves44
Public transport stops129
Walkability18.0/10013.5/100
Nearby amenities185
Population5961,583
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Otago reads as a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm; Richmond is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Richmond sits among greener hillside streets, while Otago keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Otago tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Richmond stands out for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community.

Otago suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Richmond is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons

Otago vs Richmond, TAS suburb comparison | Suburb Guide