Overall score
Para Hills
63.2/100
Pooraka
51.8/100
Para Hills for retirees and families; Pooraka for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Para Hills
63.2/100
Pooraka
51.8/100
Crime rate
Para Hills
55.6 / 1k
Pooraka
81.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Para Hills
117
Pooraka
190
Population
Para Hills
6,793
Pooraka
7,583
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Para Hills | Pooraka |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.2/100 | 51.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 64.4/100 | 68.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 55.6 / 1k | 81.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 58 | 59 |
| Walkability | 84.0/100 | 32.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 117 | 190 |
| Planning activity | 115 | 55 |
| Population | 6,793 | 7,583 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Para Hills is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Pooraka is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Para Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Pooraka keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Para Hills is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Pooraka answers with housing affordability and public transport access.
Retirees and families may find Para Hills the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Pooraka.