Overall score
Parklands
19.2/100
Silver Sands
30.7/100
Silver Sands for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Parklands
19.2/100
Silver Sands
30.7/100
Crime rate
Parklands
20942.3 / 1k
Silver Sands
9601.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Parklands
40
Silver Sands
16
Population
Parklands
603
Silver Sands
1,451
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Parklands | Silver Sands |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 19.2/100 | 30.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 9.0/100 | 27.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 20942.3 / 1k | 9601.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 3 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 40 | 16 |
| Population | 603 | 1,451 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Parklands is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Silver Sands is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Silver Sands leans into coastal living, while Parklands feels more inland and suburban in character.
Parklands pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Silver Sands is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Silver Sands, while Parklands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.