Parklands vs Silver Sands, WA suburb comparison

Silver Sands for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ParklandsSilver Sands

Overall score

Parklands

19.2/100

Silver Sands

30.7/100

Crime rate

Parklands

20942.3 / 1k

Silver Sands

9601.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Parklands

40

Silver Sands

16

Population

Parklands

603

Silver Sands

1,451

Metric leadParklands 2Silver Sands 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryParklandsSilver Sands
Overall score19.2/10030.7/100
Housing (desirability)9.0/10027.8/100
Crime rate20942.3 / 1k9601.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools23
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops3
Walkability0.0/1004.5/100
Nearby amenities4016
Population6031,451
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/105/10

Comparison summary

Parklands is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Silver Sands is a coastal smaller community with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Silver Sands leans into coastal living, while Parklands feels more inland and suburban in character.

Parklands pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Silver Sands is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Silver Sands, while Parklands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons