Overall score
Peterhead
34.4/100
Rosewater
31.3/100
Peterhead for families and investment; Rosewater for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Peterhead
34.4/100
Rosewater
31.3/100
Crime rate
Peterhead
235.4 / 1k
Rosewater
91.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Peterhead
27
Rosewater
127
Population
Peterhead
1,201
Rosewater
3,582
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Peterhead | Rosewater |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.4/100 | 31.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.4/100 | 59.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 235.4 / 1k | 91.0 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 56.4/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 15 |
| Walkability | 9.5/100 | 36.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 27 | 127 |
| Planning activity | 10 | 50 |
| Green cover | 0.2% | 0.5% |
| Population | 1,201 | 3,582 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Peterhead is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Rosewater is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Peterhead pulls ahead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Rosewater is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability.
Families and households prioritising schools may find Peterhead the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Rosewater.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.