Pimpama vs Devonport suburb comparison (QLD vs TAS)

Pimpama for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PimpamaDevonport

Overall score

Pimpama

67.1/100

Devonport

71.3/100

Crime rate

Pimpama

28.2 / 1k

Devonport

165.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Pimpama

85

Devonport

321

Population

Pimpama

24,601

Devonport

14,481

Metric leadPimpama 6Devonport 4across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPimpamaDevonport
Overall score67.1/10071.3/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10073.3/100
Crime rate28.2 / 1k165.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools110
Parks & reserves144
Public transport stops7973
Walkability69.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities85321
Population24,60114,481
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Pimpama is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Devonport is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience. Pimpama sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Devonport is further into the wider countryside.

On the data, Pimpama is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Devonport answers with schools and education options and walkability. Pimpama generally means more sought-after housing, while Devonport leans toward more approachable housing costs.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Pimpama, while Devonport remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons