Pimpama vs Steiglitz, QLD suburb comparison

Pimpama for retirees and families; Steiglitz for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PimpamaSteiglitz

Overall score

Pimpama

67.0/100

Steiglitz

45.3/100

Crime rate

Pimpama

29.7 / 1k

Steiglitz

71.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Pimpama

85

Steiglitz

14

Population

Pimpama

24,601

Steiglitz

682

Metric leadPimpama 7Steiglitz 1across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPimpamaSteiglitz
Overall score67.0/10045.3/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10079.7/100
Crime rate29.7 / 1k71.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves141
Public transport stops79
Walkability69.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities8514
Population24,601682
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/104/10

Comparison summary

Pimpama reads as an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Steiglitz is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Pimpama sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Steiglitz is within day-trip reach of the capital.

On the data, Pimpama is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Steiglitz answers with housing affordability. Pimpama generally means more sought-after housing, while Steiglitz leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Pimpama suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Steiglitz is the stronger match for investors.

Related comparisons