Overall score
Coomera
66.5/100
Pimpama
67.0/100
Coomera for families and schools; Pimpama for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coomera
66.5/100
Pimpama
67.0/100
Crime rate
Coomera
29.7 / 1k
Pimpama
29.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coomera
111
Pimpama
85
Population
Coomera
20,225
Pimpama
24,601
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coomera | Pimpama |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.5/100 | 67.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.7 / 1k | 29.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 14 |
| Public transport stops | 64 | 79 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 69.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 111 | 85 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 20,225 | 24,601 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 5/10 |
Put side by side, Coomera is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Pimpama is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Coomera is stronger for schools and education options and nearby cafés and amenities; Pimpama answers with public transport access and walkability.
On balance, investors are more likely to prefer Pimpama, while Coomera remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.