Overall score
Coomera
48.6/100
Jacobs Well
55.5/100
Coomera for retirees; Jacobs Well for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coomera
48.6/100
Jacobs Well
55.5/100
Crime rate
Coomera
49.0 / 1k
Jacobs Well
34.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coomera
113
Jacobs Well
49
Population
Coomera
20,225
Jacobs Well
2,882
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coomera | Jacobs Well |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.6/100 | 55.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.0/100 | 60.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 49.0 / 1k | 34.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 42.8/100 | 42.8/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 64 | 10 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 113 | 49 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Green cover | 17.4% | 0.8% |
| Population | 20,225 | 2,882 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Coomera reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Jacobs Well is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Jacobs Well sits among greener hillside streets, while Coomera keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Coomera tends to lead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Jacobs Well stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.
Coomera suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Jacobs Well is the stronger match for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.