Coomera vs Jacobs Well, QLD Suburb Comparison

Coomera for retirees; Jacobs Well for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CoomeraJacobs Well

Overall score

Coomera

48.6/100

Jacobs Well

55.5/100

Crime rate

Coomera

49.0 / 1k

Jacobs Well

34.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Coomera

113

Jacobs Well

49

Population

Coomera

20,225

Jacobs Well

2,882

Metric leadCoomera 5Jacobs Well 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoomeraJacobs Well
Overall score48.6/10055.5/100
Housing (desirability)44.0/10060.9/100
Crime rate49.0 / 1k34.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools5—
Weather (desirability)42.8/10042.8/100
Parks & reserves145
Public transport stops6410
Walkability57.0/10063.0/100
Nearby amenities11349
Planning activity1—
Green cover17.4%0.8%
Population20,2252,882
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/107/10

Comparison summary

Coomera reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Jacobs Well is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Jacobs Well sits among greener hillside streets, while Coomera keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Coomera tends to lead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Jacobs Well stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and walkability.

Coomera suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Jacobs Well is the stronger match for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons