Overall score
Coomera
66.5/100
Jacobs Well
65.3/100
Coomera for schools; Jacobs Well for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Coomera
66.5/100
Jacobs Well
65.3/100
Crime rate
Coomera
29.7 / 1k
Jacobs Well
20.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Coomera
111
Jacobs Well
48
Population
Coomera
20,225
Jacobs Well
2,882
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Coomera | Jacobs Well |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.5/100 | 65.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.7 / 1k | 20.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | 64 | 10 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 111 | 48 |
| Planning activity | 1 | — |
| Population | 20,225 | 2,882 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Coomera reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Jacobs Well is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Jacobs Well sits among greener hillside streets, while Coomera keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Coomera tends to lead on parks and reserves and public transport access, while Jacobs Well stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Coomera suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Jacobs Well is the stronger match for retirees and investors.